Advancing the Evidence Base for Equine-Assisted Psychotherapy
PEER-REVIEWED International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health
Eagala is proud to share a major milestone: the first peer-reviewed study evaluating the Eagala Model has been officially published.
|
MDPI open access
|
|
The study appears in the International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health, a respected, peer-reviewed scientific journal published by MDPI. This publication represents an important step forward in building a rigorous, evidence-informed foundation for equine-assisted psychotherapy and for the Eagala Model specifically.
|
About the Research
| Title:
A Multi-Site Observational Evaluation of the Equine Assisted Growth and Learning Association Model of Equine-Assisted Psychotherapy for Veteran Trauma Survivors
What was studied:
The research evaluated the feasibility, safety, treatment engagement, and preliminary outcomes of the Eagala Model when delivered across 12 Eagala-designated therapeutic equine sites serving 107 active-duty military members and veterans with trauma histories.
|
Key findings
- Significant reductions in PTSD symptoms, depression, and functional disability
- Increased satisfaction with life among participants
- Exceptionally high treatment engagement and completion rates
- Successful implementation of the Eagala Model across multiple sites
Together, these findings support the Eagala Model as a structured, scalable, and promising approach for trauma-informed equine-assisted psychotherapy.
|
Research Team & Collaboration
|
The study was authored by a multidisciplinary team:
Halina Kowalski Hannah Van Buiten Patricia Hopkins Connie Baldwin (Eagala) Elena Nazarenko Dr. William R. Marchand
The research was supported by Eagala and the VA Whole Health Service at the Salt Lake City Health Care System, with partial funding from a U.S. Department of Veterans Affairs Adaptive Sports Grant.
|
Read the Full Study
|
We invite practitioners, researchers, and stakeholders to explore the full publication and review the findings directly.
|
|